Showing posts with label soft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label soft. Show all posts

2025-08-11

Photo of the Week 2025-08-11

 
I've come upon an unexpected, though not entirely surprising fork in the road on this leg of my photographic journey. Returning to film photography required a return to some older, in fact vintage gear, some of which I've mentioned in previous posts.
 
Today's image started with an opportunity to acquire (at no cost) a few Canon FD film camera bodies and lenses. This led me to pick up an adapter that would enable me to use the lenses on my current digital bodies. I'd intended the set up to be used mainly for quickly testing performance and operation of the vintage lenses which can suffer from a number of issues relating to age and poor storage conditions. Initial test shots using our Wheaten Terrier, Sullivan, as captive subject were very successful and inspired me with something else to explore.
 
And explore I did ...
 
' dreamy knapweed '

One of the vintage lenses in my arsenal is a 
1971 vintage Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 Chrome Nose and ... what's the sense in having a f/1.2 lens if you don't shoot it wide open? 
 
Right?
 
Right!
 
This image captured in mid day sun, along a local concession road where chicory and knapweed are in abundance. Shot with my lovely, very clean copy of the 55mm f/1.2 on my 2020 vintage Canon EOS R5.
 
Using vintage lenses means manually focusing and wide open at f/1.2 near the lenses closest focus distance proved a challenge hand held. The conditions may have been better suited to using a tripod to steady the camera and using the rear LCD display magnified to focus because the depth of field is very, very thin.
 
And what does a 1971 vintage Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 Chrome Nose look like. This ...
 

It's a hefty beast for a  'standard' lens, weighing in at 565g (1.25 lbs) due to it's all brass, metal and glass construction typical of the day. By comparison a typical 50mm standard lens today can weigh half as much. Of course comparable premium lenses are comparable in weight but without the solid feel and tactile helicoid focus system.
 
With results like this, there just may be a return to the shallow DoF style that some knew me for a few years ago.  
 
DJE

2012-03-26

Photo of the Week 2012-03-26

white tulip


A field trip to the Royal Botanical Gardens (RBG) in Burlington is always welcome as the grey of winter passes. The indoor garden displays provide a suggestion of the colour that is about to bloom in the gardens of local neighbourhoods.

A presentation by a expert on macro photography given at this month's meeting of the Guelph Photographers Guild and a follow up outing to RBG was planned for members to practice their macro tricks and techniques. I missed the presentation but having taken a workshop previously led by the same photographer, I decided to tag along for some of the fun.

Macro
Photography (actually it's regularly close-up photography and not true Macro Photography but that's a discussion for a different day) can involve expensive gear, specialty lenses and lighting but it can also be done on a limited budget with inexpensive additions to the equipment that most photographers already have. This week's image is an example of the latter. I did go to RBG with my specialty macro lens, sturdy tripod and ball head and I did use that gear to captured a number of decent images. However, it was a standard 50mm f/1.4 lens and an inexpensive extension tube that I used to capture this image. Holding the camera by hand while hovering over a waist level bench of tulips I positioned myself to look down into one in particular.

The depth of focus (DoF) for close up photography can be very shallow and require stopping down the aperture and using long shutter speeds with supplemental lighting if you want to create an image that is entirely in focus. I particularly like the look of narrow DoF when it's used in a manner that directs attention to specific elements of a photograph or creates an abstract feeling. The DoF in this image is extremely shallow and focusing to get a specific element sharp required some effort. In order to get the focus on the very end of the pistil I set the focus to manual, adjusted it and left it fixed. As I composed the image, wavering slightly, the pistil would be in focus and then out of focus as the camera to subject distance varied minutely. Holding the composition as best I could, I intentionally moved slightly in and out and kept my breathing smooth. Just when the element came in focus I gently released the shutter to make an exposure. It's much easier to do this rather than try to stay perfectly still which actually causes you to tense up and possibly tremble slightly making a it
near impossible to get the focus as intended.

A bit of inexpensive kit and a use of technique can make for a strong macro image.

DJE